Showing posts with label De' theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label De' theory. Show all posts

Monday, May 28, 2012

What is IPL for?


Every IPL it became a habit of mine to say that it is a big distraction to everyone in this country that the government has planned. Using that as distraction for public, government is sneaking up and doing all the things it needs to do.
In the last weeks of IPL:
Blocked viewing of sites on internet like a dictator.
Granted bail to Raja the scammer.
A horrific train accident whose reasons unknown. [ I donno whether it is conspiracy or not. But I strongly feel it is the part of the plan and it happened on a track on which nothing like that happens]
A huge petrol hike, which will be roleld back. [They will roll back for sure but huge increase is done because they want public distracted about other issues]
A arrest of some one who is a threat to the government.  [Jagan’s arrest is nicely planned to avoid agitation among his followers]
All the aboev said are assumptions and I feel they are linked some way or the other. The government is a big notorious one.
People please stop following IPL, it is just a distraction like colosseum in rome. 5 more seasons of IPL you will be chocked by the rules and you don’t even know when they are made. 


Locations of visitors to this page 

Thursday, January 12, 2012

What is correct with us?


We are always good with what is wrong with us or society and everything else. We are just not graceful to know how lucky we are, to have those special virtues to survive in the society.

How we tackled women empowerment is still an eye opener thing that I noticed. We still can accept women who earn less and as a wife. We [When I speak We it is society] are OK with our wives or sisters to earn more than us. Forget Earning we even let them Learn more than men. And always marry them to a guy who Learned and Earned a lot than them.

Marriage is such a soul mate thing now a days. Now we don’t have dowry at all, we have is token of love and affection. Arranged marriages which used to bitter business deals in olden days, now sugar coated. How Sweet !!

Shopping is a nice thing now a days. We shop for lot of reasons and we do show case that stuff in our homes to everyone. Similarly we get married and showcase each other for a year or so then get fed up or succumb to the partner’s choice or better have kids with no adoptions but helping in keeping the nation young.

Surprised to see women not celebrating birthdays because their husband is not there, I don’t get it?? Your beloved ne is not there that doesn’t meant that you need to sit and mourn or what??? You should have celebrated your past 20 or 25 birthdays without your husband, that’s why I understand this mourning is acceptable.

Emotional need and emotional baggage go in tandem, You should carry less so the need will be less. We always contradict the above statement, as we are from old school. How emotional we are to carry the dead weight. We believe in traditions for sure.

People when they marry, how unbiased they think, I still can’t imagine. The height and weight always matters, not in knowledge for sure. Standards should be met that are set by society or else you are filled with guilt.

People work more and earn the same as inflation is high. Now lot of people don’t know what to do when they are retired which is weird. Some still work rather than doing pursuing something. How down to earth we are. I here by to conclude that machines can never over take us. As we are machines. Now I Can sleep properly that the thought of not being ruled by machines.

We always embrace the change by deceiving it. By never changing in the ideals, but by always changing the appearance of the stands we take. How thoughtful and imaginative we are.

Adopt a kid if you have one. Or else adopt two and avoid having one. Believe in your gut feeling and I am not talking about you narcissists’ because I know what reply you are going to give.


Locations of visitors to this page

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Why to break the glass….?


Glass… a glass through which one can look through, but it still obscure the vision. Usually we all use such a glass around us to keep in the aura of not feeling intimidated by other person’s actions. And we always skip to notice those actions.

The glass will be always there… and it always helps us to feel better initially to stay with them for some time to later to more time. When once we decided to move with the person and then we want to spend more time with the person we like, through the glass. For us now the glass becomes like a veil covering the original person’s character and we as the being truthful at hearts act like children and wish to see the other side of the glass.

Thinking that the new frontiers of the other person will keep us more lively and also excited and funny, so that things are greater to live with that person. Everybody has their own reason to break the glass. Some love to see the other side, some are anxious, some are interested to see the other side, some love to break down the person into more simple logic so that they can pursue them for their own benefits, and some unknowingly break that.

Once it breaks, if there weren’t any assumptions things would be much better. But, with the perceptions and visions we have with the previous experiences we prefer to have an image and always try to match with that. Now, with the image not matching with the real one, people are more agitated and disturbed.

Actually breaking the glass should help but with this disturbance seeping into our lives we tend to send the waves of disturbance into everything possible. The distributed disturbance won’t vanish, as we are the disturbance and where ever we go we carry that spoiling what all is good.

Now, being not meeting the expectations causes agitations and we will never talk with the person once we are through the glass. And we think leaving them like that knowingly also will help us to cope up with them. Once the blocks of void start coming on between our loved ones and us, at this point we can only see the person we love to live with, very far though we are living with them very close to each other.

So, why break the glass. Some times even a nice friendship is also broken when one tries to break through the glass and cross the line and peak in to satisfy the little curiosity. And end up loosing all the masti and fun they are having. When some things are left untouched are better and preferred in that way.

It is not any call to break the glass and it is not either to keep it intact. Just a note to remember that when you break the glass what ever seems to be on the other side of the kaleidoscope you are watching might be not the same. So be prepared for nothing. Have fun with everything.

Friday, August 7, 2009

What is wrong with corporatism?

I was wondering when I used to hear people saying that they loved their company and living for their company and even backing up their company when it is in crisis. It is something like treating a family member and taking responsibility to solve the issue.

Which is lacking in now a days companies. They do have brilliant HR people working for them. Even with out HRs many companies are able to create the impact of owing-ness to the employees. Now, people are more greedy and selfish to themselves. Everybody wants the same first piece of the cake. There is nothing wrong in thinking that. But, sharing gives u joy. Which nobody cares.

People now work for themselves and only for themselves and that is induced effectively by corporate methods. They are now playing with the greed rather than asking them to do the humanity thing.

These corporate people want profits. While we need hikes. Is that the only reason we are staying together.

There is nothing to blame the system as it is made by us. The people in the system are spoiling the system. There was this mail from one corporate head stating that the rules and regulations once valid or not valid now as we are hit by recession. That means the ethics are not valid and we have to change according to the situations on the basis of profit rather than compassion.

Don’t gimme that word business has no place for human emotions. The products we design and sell outside are taken by some person as a gift, or as a prize for an achievement or as a necessity to survive all these are linked to emotions. And people fiddling with emotions is not what we need.

Ethics and basic fundas always stay basic and strong. When something is built on the basis of profits and greed or fame what ever it is it never stays for ever. Making a difference is not all you need to survive. And difference can be made only when u know something apart from others. That is the truth and people do that. And people do even worse to survive.

When all the survivors of the pandemic are cunning then who else will survive when all ditch each other for their own. We are good only when we are on groups.

The people are brain washed that customers are the ultimate gods. If god has a problem and cutting down his company to half, what else can you do? And say that god itself is in trouble you guys being normal ones have to face the trouble of firing, salary cuttings.

Is that a way to say something? They always say that customer is god and if he can’t take care of himself we can never take care of ourselves.

People love their company and give more and more and more to satisfy not only themselves but also to encourage the growth factor of the company.

Instead of customer perspective they might have told “whatever is the condition we will stick together and continue the sailing”, which they never say. Why because it is not that they can’t it is that they are not ready to take responsibility.

One can never be a great leader and a great visionary to lead with such lack of humanity. It is WE not you, him or them.
Being the second most populated country people say that if you want to go just go. We always have options. Option or opportunity is something when you alone get it. If some hundreds or thousands try for a job then it can never be an opportunity.

In ones life the major part stays in office and colleagues surrounded by them. When all those are driven by the only one thing greed. The word compassionate and passion doesn’t need any more. They all work for themselves at the cost of others. And the whole society turns out like that.

Kids are taught to do such things to ditch others. Now there is no knowledge transfer for knowledge begets knowledge principle, there is only one thing hiding knowledge begets appraisals, benefits, and profits.

I never say no to competition. We always need competition but to enhance and enrich ourselves rather than crippling ourselves without sharing it.

It may sound vague. But all these are inter – related.

Corporates have become the places of no compassion to each other. And making the society do the same. Stop doing the mistakes now foresee the danger and act.

Views are appreciated.
Locations of visitors to this page

Monday, February 23, 2009

Dining philosophers problem

The dining philosophers problem is summarized as five philosophers sitting at a table doing one of two things: eating or thinking. While eating, they are not thinking, and while thinking, they are not eating. The five philosophers sit at a circular table with a large bowl of spaghetti in the center. A fork is placed in between each philosopher, and as such, each philosopher has one fork to his or her left and one fork to his or her right. As spaghetti is difficult to serve and eat with a single fork, it is assumed that a philosopher must eat with two forks. The philosopher can only use the fork on his or her immediate left or right.

Illustration of the dining philosophers problem
The dining philosophers problem is sometimes explained using rice and chopsticks rather than spaghetti and forks, as it is more intuitively obvious that two chopsticks are required to begin eating.
The philosophers never speak to each other, which creates a dangerous possibility of deadlock when every philosopher holds a left fork and waits perpetually for a right fork (or vice versa).
Originally used as a means of illustrating the problem of deadlock, this system reaches deadlock when there is a 'cycle of unwarranted requests'. In this case philosopher P1 waits for the fork grabbed by philosopher P2 who is waiting for the fork of philosopher P3 and so forth, making a circular chain.
Starvation (and the pun was intended in the original problem description) might also occur independently of deadlock if a philosopher is unable to acquire both forks due to a timing issue. For example there might be a rule that the philosophers put down a fork after waiting five minutes for the other fork to become available and wait a further five minutes before making their next attempt. This scheme eliminates the possibility of deadlock (the system can always advance to a different state) but still suffers from the problem of livelock. If all five philosophers appear in the dining room at exactly the same time and each picks up their left fork at the same time the philosophers will wait five minutes until they all put their forks down and then wait a further five minutes before they all pick them up again.
The lack of available forks is an analogy to the lacking of shared resources in real computer programming, a situation known as concurrency. Locking a resource is a common technique to ensure the resource is accessed by only one program or chunk of code at a time. When the resource a program is interested in is already locked by another one, the program waits until it is unlocked. When several programs are involved in locking resources, deadlock might happen, depending on the circumstances. For example, one program needs two files to process. When two such programs lock one file each, both programs wait for the other one to unlock the other file, which will never happen.
In general the dining philosophers problem is a generic and abstract problem used for explaining various issues which arise in problems which hold mutual exclusion as a core idea. For example, as in the above case deadlock/livelock is well explained with the dining philosophers problem.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

De' APPLE THEORY

Boys are like apples on trees।
The best ones are at the top of the tree।
The girls don't want to reach for the good ones because they're afraid of falling and getting hurt।
Instead they just get the rotten apples that are on the ground, that aren't as good, but
So the apples at the top think that there is something wrong with them,when in reality, they are amazing.
That is why we just have to be a little patient and wait for the rightgirlwho will come someday..... ..the one who has the courage to reach the top
So Guys if you are alone...this means that u r on top......... .!!!!Girls should take a chance to find the good, right apple.......:-):-):-)